Thursday 24 November 2016

J.J. Abrams & Bob Iger Reflect On the Pressures of Star Wars

Well, who is the third-highest grossing movie ever, and in some circles the best return of the Jedi, it's easy to forget how good a wager was Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Ten years have passed since the last movie Star Wars (The Clone Wars with the driver just yet), and that the release led to the story of the saga, which had developed slowly in Darth Vader, in its entirety. No reason to say more. On top of that, the disgust that many older fans had with the prequels, and the pressure to do well (and the cost of the wrong) was immeasurable.
J.J. Abrams & Bob Iger Reflect On the Pressures of Star Wars


You must have a new interesting story that has made people excited about the future, while a strong nostalgia bustling and recovered from some of the more dubious franchise phrases burned. Disney and Lucasfilm took him out of the galaxy is not an accomplishment and is a proof ultimately involved in many creative skills but slightly less than the director J.J. Abrams and Disney CEO Bob Iger.

Interviewing Iger Variety, Abrams talked about the pressure of the film and how much money Disney property had largely emerged. Here is a transcript of the conversation:

Abrams: When working in the film was a great collaboration. It was amazingly fun.

Iger: It's very nice of you.

Abrams: No, no. It is true, we are in the camera. What are your role and the normal operating system for you?

Iger: In my case, and I remember you and I had dinner at the time you decided that you did, or you are considering. (Laughs) I remembered that it was the acquisition of $ 4 billion, I believe it was $ 4 billion $ 50 million.

Abrams: She said, "This is a movie for $ 4 billion." I remember when you said that I thought, "Oh, my God ..."

I think he tried to say, "Listen, boy, this is not just a movie ..."

Abrams: loud and clear.

Iger: A great responsibility, but perhaps in me the father. I wanted to say, but I am also in the process of telegraphy do not know if I am particularly subtle, but because of the size of the acquisition and that this is initially represented in terms of the importance of film it, is not treated like all the old Disney full movie will.

Source : Screenrant

Fantastic Beasts : Newt Scamander Won’t Be the Lead in All the Sequels

What fantastic animals and where to find them has changed greatly in recent years. Originally a book in the world of Hogwarts, J.K. Rowling introduced him in 2001 to Comic Relief. Then, when the series of Harry Potter films had gone, it became known that the thin volume would be a spin-off prequel - first, then three and now five films. Now that the movie is, it became clear that, far from telling us how to discover the monsters, the series has a much more important role in the history of the magic world.
Fantastic Beasts

However, because he is the author of the book holder, Newt Scamander should be the star of the series (especially since there are many ways you can influence the bigger story). However, based on the opinion of the head of the franchise, which is not the case, top Best Sites 300mbmovies4u Here The Latest Movies Free Download.

In conversation with Cinema Blend, David Heyman, who produced all Potter films and fantastic animals, revealed that during the magizólogo Eddie Redmayne will still be in four films, it is unlikely that the main plot will be as in the first:

"I do not think the heart of each of them, I think it will be one - will be a part of the next." So Tina, Queenie and Jacob ".

The whole talk of the young Albus Dumbledore appeared in the pursuit of the fantastic animals and the revelation that the series go all the way to 1945, the year of the defeat of Grindelwald Gillert has already suggested that these films move away from Newt with on the legendary Conflict between Dumbledore and Grindelwald (first reference in the book Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone in 1997). This is always then the first official word confirms that Newt will not anchors the events as herons - and there was confusion about where the series goes, Heyman deals with that in a follow-up question:

"and Credence and Grindelwald, I think this will be the main actresses."
Credits Ezra Miller, a gentle magician who was stripped of his power because it is an extremely dangerous Obscurus, was wooed by Grindelwald Johnny Depp (on the pretext of Percival Graves Colin Farrell) and escaped to New York in a cut scene from Fantastic Beasts . Prior to the release of the film on his role in the story was unknown, but it is now clear Credence and his powers are an essential part of the bigger story told here.

This message is a shame to the fans of Newt, however. The character was a strong leader, not Potter and while some found their lack of history a little weak, the lack of exploration was acceptable with the promise of subsequent films that have been explored. With this development, it is unclear to what extent it was important to begin when everything was said and done in Fantastic Animals, the first movie can feel like the one-one strange to the epic conflict tangential, series is ultimate.

On the other hand, it is good to hear that we have not seen the last of Tina, Queenie, and Jacob. Katherine Waterston, Alison Sudol, and Dan Fogler should return (as they have signed contracts for three films), but Fantastic Animals round each of their stories so they are exiled to have only a major expansion of Pottermore. It is good that after hearing all is not the case.
Source : Screenrant
 

©2009 300mbmovies4u | by TNB